ACCC proposes to deny industry code on marketing of infant formula
The Australian Competition & Consumer Commission (ACCC) is proposing to deny the authorisation sought by the Infant Nutrition Council for an industry code which seeks to restrict the advertising and promotion of infant formula. The Commission considers that the code is no longer likely to give rise to public benefits that outweigh the likely public detriment.
The Infant Nutrition Council is seeking authorisation to continue to implement the ‘Marketing in Australia of Infant Formula: Manufacturers and Importers Agreement’ (MAIF Agreement) and its associated guidelines for a further five years. The MAIF Agreement, initially established in 1992, forms part of Australia’s response to its obligations as a signatory to the World Health Organization’s International Code of Marketing Breast Milk Substitutes.
The MAIF Agreement is a voluntary, self-regulatory code of conduct that aims to restrict those manufacturers and importers of infant formula who opt in to the agreement from advertising and promoting formula for infants up to 12 months of age. Its implementation requires ACCC authorisation as it forms an agreement between competitors not to market their infant formula products.
“The link between breastfeeding and improved health outcomes for mothers and children is undisputed,” ACCC Deputy Chair Mick Keogh said.
“However, while the MAIF Agreement aims to protect and promote breastfeeding rates in Australia, we are concerned that there are several factors that undermine its effectiveness. This includes its voluntary nature, its limited scope, and restrictions on its ability to capture the breadth of modern digital marketing methods, such as the use of social media algorithms and content created by third-party influencers.”
In 2021, manufacturers and importers were granted authorisation by the ACCC enabling them to continue implementing the MAIF Agreement for a three-year period.
The ACCC noted at that time, however, that the decision was finely balanced and that the risk of public detriment outweighing public benefit would grow should the period exceed the agreed three-year duration.
The Department of Health and Aged Care has since commissioned an independent review of the MAIF Agreement which found that it is no longer fit for purpose. The review recommended that the agreement be replaced with a stronger regulatory framework in the form of a legislated, prescribed, mandatory code.
“Effective government regulation of infant formula marketing would likely result in public health benefits,” Keogh said.
The Australian Government is considering the findings of the review, though the timing and nature of its response is not yet certain.
“Given the issues undermining its effectiveness, the ACCC is not satisfied that the MAIF Agreement and associated guidelines are likely to result in a net public benefit to justify authorisation,” Keogh said.
The ACCC granted interim authorisation on 14 August 2024 to enable the MAIF Agreement to continue while the ACCC completes its assessment of the substantive application for authorisation. This interim authorisation remains in place while the ACCC completes its assessment.
The ACCC is seeking submissions in response to the draft determination by 17 October 2024 before making its final decision.
More information about the application is available here.
Expanding beyond biscuits: Arnott's acquires Prolife Foods
The Arnott's Group has expanded its 'better-for-you' snacking portfolio with the...
FDA investigates PFAS in seafood
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) expands its investigation on per- and polyfluoroalkyl...
Cell-cultured quail moving closer to Australians' plates
FSANZ is undertaking a second round of consultation on a proposed approach to allow cell-cultured...