Labelling seafood made from fish cells


Friday, 13 August, 2021

Labelling seafood made from fish cells

While Australia prepares for a Senate Inquiry into food labelling of plant-based meat, in the US a study has looked at what to call seafood made from fish cells.

According to a recent Rutgers study in the Journal of Food Science, terms such as ‘cell-based’ or ‘cell-cultured’ should be used when labelling and talking about seafood products made from the cells of fish or shellfish.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration and U.S. Department of Agriculture require food products to have a “common or usual name” on their labels, so consumers can make informed choices.

With more than 70 companies around the world developing cell-cultured protein products and more than $360 million invested in their development in 2020 alone, the adoption of one common name is crucial as products move closer to commercialisation.

The study by William Hallman, a professor who chairs the Department of Human Ecology in the School of Environmental and Biological Sciences at Rutgers University-New Brunswick, confirmed the results from his earlier study comparing seven potential names for these products.

In the new study, a representative sample of 1200 consumers evaluated packages of Atlantic salmon designed to mimic those found in grocery stores, labelled with ‘cell-based seafood’ or ‘cell-cultured seafood’.

The names were evaluated using five criteria:

  • ability to help consumers distinguish cell-cultured seafood from wild and farmed fish;
  • to signal its potential as an allergen;
  • to be seen as an appropriate term for the product;
  • to not disparage cell-cultured or conventional products; and
  • to not evoke thoughts, images or emotions that the products aren't safe, healthy and nutritious.

“The results suggest that both 'cell-based seafood' and 'cell-cultured seafood' meet FDA regulations,” Hallman said.

“They help the majority of consumers understand that the new products are produced in a different way from the 'wild-caught' and 'farm-raised' fish they may already be buying. At the same time, consumers also recognised that if they are allergic to seafood, they shouldn't eat the product.

“Both names work well. The key is to choose a single term and to get everyone to adopt it. That will reduce confusion and ultimately help consumers understand what they are buying.”

Image credit: ©stock.adobe.com/au/kongvector

Related News

Calorie labelling policy vs consumption — insights from the UK

As Australia reviews the Health Star Rating (HSR) and the nutrition information panel (NIP)...

HSR and NIP labelling under review, FSANZ calls for information

FSANZ is conducting an early-stage call for information on the Health Star Rating (HSR) and...

Concerns over changes to GM food definition

The AOL has expressed concerns over Food Standards Australia New Zealand's (FSANZ) Proposal...


  • All content Copyright © 2024 Westwick-Farrow Pty Ltd